Дискурсивное изучение особенностей языка религии
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26577//EJRS.2021.v27.i3.r4Ключевые слова:
язык религии, знак, символ, лингвистика, религиозная философияАннотация
At present, religion is integrated into almost all spheres of human life, has experienced a period of revival, and is developing in a new direction. Therefore, the discursive study of religious issues, that is, the analysis of issues related to religion in the context of modern discourse, is an important and relevant area of research. Considering that the purpose of this study is to identify and describe the features of the concept of language according to its nature and use in a religious context, which is closely related to the concept of religion, the main areas of research include religious studies and linguistic views, and it is aimed at demonstrating that the differences between the language of religion and language of everyday use directly contribute to its ability to influence the consciousness of believers, fully conveying religious statements. Research results are important because they show the characteristics and ways of conducting discourse analysis and can help in applying these results. The study used a variety of general and individual scientific methods. The features of the language of religion are revealed, conclusions about their meaning and use are analyzed, a general and complete picture of the language of religion is formed. Knowledge of the general characteristics and capabilities of the language of religion helps to find solutions to many religious problems and prevent them.
Key words: language, language of religion, sign, symbol, linguistics, religious philosophy.
Библиографические ссылки
Безлепкин Н.И. (2002) Философия языка в России. К истории русской лингвофилософии. – Спб: Искусство. – 7.
Бородай С.Ю. (2013) Современное понимание проблемы лингвистической относительности: работы по пространственной концептуализации. Вопросы языкознания: журнал, № 4. – 18.
Гегел Г.В.Ф. (1969) Эстетика в 4-х т. – М.: Искусство. Том 2. – 14.
Иларион игумен (Алфеев) (2000) Таинство веры. Введение в православное догматическое богословие. – Клин. – 71.
Пивоваров Д. В. (2006) Особенности языка религии. Научные труды профессоров Уральского института экономики, управления и права. – Екатеринбург. № 3. – 229-263.
Пивоваров Д.В. (1987) Операционный аспект научного знания. – Иркутск: Гл. 4, 176
Сабдин А.К. (2020) Теологические нарративы дерадикализации: методическое пособие. – Алматы: Бсяуаред. – 67-68
Томпсон М. (2001) Философия религии / пер. с англ. – М.: ФАИР-ПРЕСС. – 122-124
References
Akіmhanov A.B., Anarbaev N.S. (2020) Quran karіm (qazaqsha tusіndіrmelі audarma). «Ibrahim» suresі, 4-ajat. [Quran Karim (kazakh explanational translation). Surah “Ibrahim”, Verse 4]. – 667. (in Kazakh)
Bezlepkin N.I. (2002) Filosofija jazyka v Rossii. K istorii russkoj lingvofilosofii. [Philosophy of Language in Russia. Towards the history of Russian linguistic philosophy]. – Saint-Petersburg: Iskusstvo. – 7. (in Russian)
Borodaj S.Ju. (2013) Sovremennoe ponimanie problemy lingvisticheskoj otnositel'nosti: raboty po prostranstvennoj konceptualizacii [Contemporary understanding of the problem of linguistic relativity: the works on space conceptualization]. Voprosy jazykoznanija: zhurnal, № 4. – 18. (in Russian)
Etim, F. (2006) Issues in Philosophy of Religion. – Uyo: Afahaide & Bros Press. – 27.
Ekpo, I. (ed). (1991) An Introduction to the Study of Religion. – Lagos: Time Publications. – 2.
Hegel G.V.F. (1969) Jestetika v 4-h t. [Esthetics in 4 vol.]. – Moscow: Iskusstvo, vol. 2. – 14. (in Russian)
Hutchinson, T., Waters, A. (1987) English for Specific Purpose. Cambridge: C.U.P., p. 7
Ilarion igumen (Alfeev) (2000) Tainstvo very. Vvedenie v pravoslavnoe dogmaticheskoe bogoslovie. [Sacrament of belief. Introduction to the dogmatic theology of the Eastern Church]. – Klin. – 71. (in Russian)
KJV Holy Bible, King James Version (2017) by Christian Art Publishers.
Pivovarov D. V. (2006) Osobennosti jazyka religii. [The peculiarities of the language of religion]. Nauchnye trudy professorov Ural'skogo instituta jekonomiki, upravlenija i prava. Ekaterinburg, № 3, pp. 229-263. (in Russian)
Pivovarov D.V. (1987) Operacionnyj aspekt nauchnogo znanija. [Operational aspect of the scientific knowledge]. – Irkutsk: Gl. 4. – 176. (in Russian)
Sabdin A.K. (2020) Teologicheskie narrativy deradikalizacii: metodicheskoe posobie. [Theological narratives of de-radicalization]. – Almaty: «Bsquared». – 67-68 (in Russian)
Thompson M. (2001) Filosofija religii / per. s angl. [Philosophy of religion]. – Moscow: FAIR-PRESS, pp. 122-124 (in Russian)
