Ecumenical pessimism and anthropological problems

Abstract

Analyzed the Problem of man in the context of irrational philosophy (A. rodonachalniki which is considered to be. Schopenhauer), which no longer identified with the mind of being, and man as a rational being is not considered. As other representatives of non-classical philosophy, Arthur Schopenhauer (1788-1860) argues that the basis of man, his tribal nature is not the mind, and a certain blind, unconscious life force, unreasonable will. The mind plays a secondary and dependent on the will’s role in human life. However, criticizing the German classical philosophy of Schopenhauer uses its basic ideas. And the Main work. Schopenhauer “the World as will and representation” (1816) was written under the direct Deputy Ashat Askarovich philosophy of Kant. Just as Kant distinguishes between “phenomenon” and the unknowable “thing in itself”, Schopenhauer regards the world as representation (as “phenomenon”) and as to the will (the “thing in itself”). A world in which man lives, is declared to be a philosopher inauthentic world. Here everything is an appearance, a Mirage. In this world it is almost impossible to distinguish between reality and dream, reality and appearance. As the world view has no place for freedom, because here, everything is subordinated to the power of the mind, space and time and the domination of the law of causality. Irrationalistic philosophy is an attempt to overcome the mechanistic concept of the world and man radikalnoe scorzoneroides, which found its nesostoiatelnosti to the mid-nineteenth century. Held in conjunction with the Kazakh philosophy.