The concept of "Faith" in the spiritual ethical and religious paradigm

Authors

  • Feruza Erzhanova Kazakh State Women’s Teacher Training University
  • Galiya Temirton Central State Museum of the Republic of Kazakhstan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26577/EJRS-2016-1-168

Abstract

The concept of «faith» in the spiritual ethical and religious paradigm
In the article the most difficult and rich period of реф лек си ровa ния of understanding is examined «faith» in history of древ не тю ркс кой philosophical idea the analysis of that will help под виг нуть on further development of national philosophy. As know, in the history of philosophy, the problem of essence of the concept of «faith» and its relation with other areas of human life (knowledge, intellect, language, etc.) was first formulated in Christianity. For centuries Christian theologians and philosophers have discussed it, offering a variety of treatments including defining faith as a transcendent, so inaccessible neither to knowledge nor experience of man... In this article the authors try to find out how and in what circumstances the concept of «faith» in the ancient Turkic language consciousness were used. And to clarify the issue attention is paid to the spiritual origins, which were laid in proto philosophy of ancient Turks. That is, in order to solve this problem, an attempt to introduce the Turks language picture of the world, since ancient times was made. At the same time, given not only the meaning of the borrowed vocabulary of Turks, in the result of various religions, but also shown the basic moral and ethical qualities, spiritual and religious functions of «Faith» concept as well.

References

1. Тенишев Э., Дыбо А. Сравнительно-историческая грамматика тюркских языков. Пратюркский язык – основа. Картина мира пратюркского этноса по данным языка. – М.: Наука, 2006. – 912 с.
2. Делез Ж., Гваттари Ф. Капитализм и шизофрения. Т.2. Тысяча плоскостей. // Тамыр, 2007, №1. – С. 84.
3. Орынбеков М.С. Предфилософия протоказахов. – Алматы: Олке, 1994.– 208 с.
4. Чунакова О.М. Зороастрийские тексты. – М.: Вост. лит-ра, 1997. – 352 с.
5. Кожевников В.А. Буддизм в сравнении с христианством. Т.2. – М.: «Грааль», 2002. – 688 с.
6. Пятигорский А.М. Введение в изучение буддийской философии (девятнадцать семинаров). – М.: Новое литературное обозрение, 2007.– 288с.
7. Зуев Ю.А. Ранние тюрки: очерки истории и идеологии. – Алматы: Дайк-пресс, 2002. – 365 с.
8. Смирнов А.В. Справедливость (опыт констрастного понимания) // Средневековая арабская философия: проблемы и решения – М.: Вост. лит-ра РАН, 1998. – С. 250-295.
9. Али-заде А. Исламский Энциклопедический словарь. – M.: Ансар, 2007. – 400 с.
10. Гуревич А.Я. Категории средневековой культуры. 2-е изд. испр. и доп. – М.: Искусство, 1984. – 350 с.
11. Абаев Н.В., Аюпов Н.Г. Тэнгрианская цивилизация в духовно-культурном и геополитическом пространстве Центральной Азии. Часть2. – Алматы, 2010. – 200 с.

Additional Files

Published

2016-10-15