Methodological principles of the semiotic approach in the study of cultural studies

Authors

  • Zharkynbek Abikenov Al-Farabi Kazakh National University
  • Tursyn Gabitov Al-Farabi Kazakh National University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26577/EJRS-2018-4-187
        151 0

Abstract

This article explains the methodological foundations of the science of semiotics which are widely used in modern cultural research science and in the study of important signs of today's society. In the methodological basis of the study, special attention was paid to the fundamentals of the analysis of semiotics, a methodological analysis was made to theoretical areas in which it was taken as an object of symbolic analysis of the study by Ferdinand de Saussure, C. Pierce, J. Lotman. In the study of the methods of the science of semiotics, a review has been made of many theoretical studies which gives us the opportunity to explore the main world outlook system in a semiotic way.

Signs surround a person from all sides: in art, nature, everyday life, wherever there is a problem of communication or perception. Therefore, the special attention of scientists F de Saussure, C. Pierce, Y. Lotman is attracted to the methods of semiotic research based on the achievements of semiotics, which is the basis for studying symbols, constructs, concepts, etc. The semiotic approach is focused primarily on the analysis of the material in the system of terms and concepts of semiotics. Thus, penetrating into the sphere of various methodological approaches, the semiotic aspect expands both the capabilities of the methodology as a whole and its own research strategies.

Author Biographies

Zharkynbek Abikenov, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University

PhD student of the 2course in "Cultural studies"

Department of Religious and Cultural studies

Tursyn Gabitov, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University

Doctor of Philosophy, Professor 

Department of Religious and Cultural studies

References

Aleksei Semenenko, (2012). The texture of culture an introduction to Yuri Lotman’s semiotic Theory. Palgrave macmillan. New York. p 22
Chandler, D, (2002). Semiotics: the Basics. London: Routlege. p.32
Daniel Chandler, (2002). SEMIOTICS THE BASICS. Routledge. New York, p. 326
Eero Tarasti, (2004). From nature to psyche. Printed by Hakapiano, Helsinki. pp 192
Eero Tarasti, (2009). Communication understanding. Printed by Greif, Tartu, pp 1293
Electronic resource. http://visual-memory.co.uk/daniel/Documents/S4B/sem01.html.
Electronic resource// http://visual-memory.co.uk/daniel/Documents/S4B/sem01.html
Melahat Arıklı, (2016). Science of Semiology: Apply to an Event. International Review of Management and Marketing, 6(4), p 1074-1079.
Melahat Arıklı, (2016). Science of Semiology: Apply to an Event. International Review of Management and Marketing, 6(4), p 1076.
Melahat Arıklı., (2016). Science of Semiology: Apply to an Event. International Review of Management and Marketing, 6(4), p 1075.
NellyShafik Ramzy, (2014). Visual language in mamluk architecture: A semiotic analysis of the Funerary Complex of Sultan Qaitbay in Cairo. Frontiers of Architectural Research, September, p 338-353
Peirce, C. S, (1960). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Volume II. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. p.28
Peirce, C. S, (1998). The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, vol. 2. Bloomington. IN: Indiana University Press. p 412
Shirong Zhang, Fan Yang, (2012). The Semiotic Analysis on the Appearance of Chinese and American Pavilions in Shanghai Expo. 145 Journal of Language Teaching and Research, Vol. 3, No 1, pp. 141-146, January ©ACADEMY PUBLISHER Manufactured in Finland.
Winfried Noth, (2006). Semiotica. Walter de Gruyter. 161–1. pp 249–263

Additional Files

How to Cite

Abikenov, Z., & Gabitov, T. (2018). Methodological principles of the semiotic approach in the study of cultural studies. Eurasian Journal of Religious Studies, 16(4), 42–48. https://doi.org/10.26577/EJRS-2018-4-187