The Importance of Religion in the formation of Cultural Knowledge and Values

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26577//EJRS.2022.v29.i1.r6

Keywords:

Сulture, Value, Identification, Factor, Cultural Research

Abstract

In this article, we investigate the crossing point of religion and social values for maintainability. In any case, the degree to which they are deciphered into cultural demeanors and behavior changes agreeing to set. Contend that whereas there is much potential back for human values for maintainability inside devout conventions, it is fundamental that religion is seen as a complex, multi-dimensional regulation wonder. Subsequently, investigation of the relationship between religion and social values must account for the set of accounts, hones. Utilizing this focal point, we appear how devout viewpoints can contribute to operationalizing speculations of systemic alter for maintainability. At long last, we lay out key standards for assist maintainability inquire about looking for to progress information on the relationship between religion and cultural values. The comes about bolster a dissociative continuum which incorporates not as it was related separation, but moreover wholeness related to concepts of extended awareness. Within the process of social investigation, ready to recognize particular components of a specific culture, patterns that incorporate the potential of the devout character. The controls the issue of social personality in terms of its specifics.

Key words: сulture, value, identification, factor, cultural research

References

References

Agapova V.N. (2018) Cultural values and methods of their classification: philosophical and cultural aspect//Philosophy and Culture.No. 9. - P. 1 - 5. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0757.2018.9.27259.
Bomberg E, Hague A (2018) Faith-based climate action in Christian congregations: mobilisation and spiritual resources. Local Environ 23:582–596. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549 839.2018.14498 22
Christie I, Gunton R, Hejnowicz AP (2019) Sustainability and the common good: Catholic social teaching and ‘integral ecology’ as contributions to a framework of social values for sustainability transitions.
Everard M, Reed MS, Kenter JO (2016) The ripple effect: Institutionalising pro-environmental values to shift societal norms and behaviours. Ecosyst Serv. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.ecose r.2016.08.001
Fossey K (2003) Buddhist faith statement. In: Alliance of religions and conservation. http://www.arcwor ld.org/faiths .asp?page.
Gifford R, Nilsson A (2014) Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: a review. Int J Psychol 49:141–157
Groot JIM, Steg L (2007) Value orientations to explain beliefs related to environmental significant behavior: how to measure egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric value orientations. Environ Behav. 330–354
Haluza-Delay R (2014) Religion and climate change: varieties in viewpoints and practices. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change 5:261–279. https ://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.268
Hand CM, Van Liere KD (1984) Religion, mastery-over-nature, and environmental concern. Soc Forces 63:555–570
Hartland Narayanan V (2001) Water, wood, and wisdom: ecological perspectives from Hindu traditions. Daedalus 4:179–206
Hawcroft LJ, Milfont TL (2010) The use (and abuse) of the new environmental paradigm scale over the last 30 years: a meta-analysis. J Environ Psychol 30(2):143–158.
Hedlund-de Witt A (2012) Exploring worldviews and their relationships to sustainable lifestyles: towards a new conceptual and methodological approach. Ecol Econ 84:74–83. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ecole.
Hitzhusen GE, Tucker ME (2013) The potential of religion for Earth Stewardship. Front Ecol Environ 11:368–376. https ://doi. org/10.1890/12032 2
Ives CD, Fischer J et al (2017) The self-sabotage of conservation: reply to Manfredo et al. Conserv Biol 31:1483–1485. https://doi. org/10.1111/cobi.13025
Ives CD, Kendal D (2014) The role of social values in the management of ecological systems. J Environ Manag 144:67–72. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jenvm an.2014.05.013 Johnston L (2013) Religion and sustainability: social movements and the politics of the environment. Routledge. London.
Kidwell J, Ginn F, Northcott M, Bomberg E, Hague A (2018) Christian climate care: slow change, modesty and eco-theo-citizenship. Geo Geograph Environ. https ://doi.org/10.1002/geo2.59.
Kluckhohn FR, Strodtbeck FL (1961) Variations in value orientations. Row, Peterson, Oxford, England.
Manfredo MJ, Bruskotter JT, Teel TL et al (2017) Why social values cannot be changed for the sake of conservation. Conserv Biol 31:772–780. https ://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12855.
Martin J-L, Maris V, Simberloff DS (2016) The need to respect nature and its limits challenges society and conservation science. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113:6105–6112.
Pew Research Centre (2017) The changing global religious landscape. http://www.pewfo rum.org/2017/04/05/the-chang ing-globa l-relig ious-lands cape/.
Reckwitz A (2002) Toward a theory of social practices: a development in culturalist theorizing. Eur J Soc Theory 5:243–263. https: //doi. org/10.1177/13684 31022 22254 32.
Rolston H (2006) Caring for nature: what science and economics canʼt teach us but religion can. Environ Values 15:307.
Saroglou V, Delpierre V, Dernelle R (2004) Values and religiosity: a meta-analysis of studies using Schwartz’s model. Personal Individ Differ 37:721–734. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2003.10.005.
Schwartz SH (1992) Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In: Zanna M (ed) Advances in experimental social psychology, vol 25. Academic, Orlando, pp 1–65.
Shove E (2010) Beyond the ABC: climate change policy and theories of social change. Environ Plan A 42:1273–1285. https://doi. org/10.1068/a4228 2.
Stern PC (2000) Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. J Soc Issues 56:407–424.
Sustain Sci Cooper N, Brady E, Bryce R, Steen H (2016) Aesthetic and spiritual values of ecosystems: recognising the ontological and axiological plurality of cultural ecosystem “services”.Ecosyst Serv 21:218–229. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.ecose r.2016.07.014 de
Sustain Sci Kenter JO, Associa S, Science M (2014) The deliberative value formation model. Ecosyst Serv. https ://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecose r.2016.09.015.
Van Riper CJ, Landon AC, Kidd S et al (2017) Incorporating sociocultural phenomena into ecosystem-service valuation: the importance of critical pluralism. Bioscience 67:233–244. https ://doi. org/10.1093/biosc i/biw17 0.
Van Riper CJ, Winkler-Schor S, Stamberger L, Keller R, Braito M, Raymond CM, Eriksson M, Golebie E, Johnson D (2019) Integrating multi-scale values and pro-environmental behavior in a protected area.
Washington Kendal D, Raymond CM (2019) Understanding pathways to shifting values over time in the context of social-ecological systems.
Woodhead L, Partridge C, Kawanami H (2016) Religions in the modern world: traditions and transformations. Routledge, Abingdon.

Additional Files

Published

2022-03-19