The prefigurative culture of Margaret Mead or the eternal problem of generation gap

Авторлар

  • Dinara Saparova Al-Farabi Kazakh National University
  • Almagul Kanagatova Almaty Management University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26577/EJRS-2018-4-186
        273 0

Кілттік сөздер:

digital culture, generation gap, prefigurative culture, Z generation, mediaculture

Аннотация

The article deals with the digital culture and its impact on modern youth and their relationship with parents. The problem of the Internet’s influence on the changing nature of relations between parents and children has been raised. The phenomenon of digital generation causes a number of contradictious opinions. Some people may say that digital generation is living at the origins of the “fourth industrial revolution”, however others consider, the disease of the 21st century is digital dependence of young people. Analysis of the modern research of the digital generation is widespread in foreign, rather than in domestic science. Most studies in Kazakhstan in the field of generation have only focused on their peculiarities and impact of the Internet on them. It is necessary to develop a research methodology and perspective directions for the development of this issue in education. This topic seeks to discuss relationship between children and parents in the present day. Do we really see the generation gap? The authors are discussing the issue of the phenomenal occurrence of the prefigurative culture, about which the well-known American anthropologist Margaret Mead wrote in the 1970s and what the forecasts of this culture will come in the future.  The statistical data of various sources, a comparative analysis of the youth of modern Kazakhstan and the youth of Europe is analyzed. Authors give examples of the risks and threats that modern youth face in the global Internet and which role play parents for “digital natives”.

Авторлардың биографисы

Dinara Saparova, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University

PhD student of 2course in "Cultural studies"

Department of Religious and Cultural studies

Almagul Kanagatova, Almaty Management University

Docotor of Philosophy

Библиографиялық сілтемелер

Central Communications Service. Ministries of information and Communications of the Republic of Kazakhstan. 2018 „Digital Autumn”. http://ru.rfi.fr/tsentralnaya-aziya/20181015-tsifrovaya-osen-frantsii-udivit-kazakhstan-novymi-tekhnologiyami-v-iskus;
Digital Kazakhstan. 2018 “The Program „Digital Kazakhstan. https://digitalkz.kz/en;
Godik Yul. 2011. Ugrozy I riski besopasnosti detskoy I podrostkovoi auditorii nowych media [The Threats and Risks for the Safety of Children's and Teenage Audience of the New Media], Mediascop. http://www.mediascope.ru/node/841;
Gosudarstvennaja Programma “Tcifrovoi Kazakhstan” na 2017-2020 goda [State Programm “Digital Kazakhstan“for 2017-2020]. Project Zerde _Text_v1_GPCK_14092016: 76;
Grossbart S., McConnell Hudges S., Pryor S., Yost A. 2002. “Socialization aspects of parents, children and the internet”. Advances in Consumer Research Volume 29, 2002: 66-70;
Goethe Institute Russland n.d. “German Children's Online University www.goethe.de/ins/ru/ru/spr/eng/kin/kin.html;
Howe N., Strauss W. 2000. “Millenials rising: the next great generation”. New York: Vintage books. https://www.amazon.com/Millennials-Rising-Next-Greatgeneration/dp/0375707190;
Hermida M., Signer S. 2013 „EU Kids Online: Schweiz. Schweizer Kinder und Jugendliche im Internet: Risikoerfahrungen und Umgang mit Risiken“. www.eukidsonline.ch, www.jugendmedien.ch;
Hasebrink U. 2018 “Growing Up in digital societies-supporting and protecting children online”. Presentation of lecture in Zurich University;
K Fund Media. Enterpreneurship. Education. Books. 2017. “Teorija pokoleniy: Osnovnye ponjatija I harakteristiki. Tschast’2” [Theory of generation: the main concepts and characteristics. Part 2]. https://kfund-media.com/ru/teoryya-pokolenyj-osnovnye-ponyatyya-y-harakterystyky-chastii/
Kaldygulova A., Kosnazarov D. 2017. “Gen Z. Pyat’ ottenkov pokolenija Z” [Gen Z. Five colours of Z generation]. Narxoz. Business Review, №2 (2), 2017;
Marti T. n.d. „Pioniere in einer neuen Zeit. Zum Bedeutungswandel von Kindheit“. https://www.erziehungskunst.de/fileadmin/archiv_alt/2003/p003ez0403-449-456-Marti.pdf: 449-456;
Mead M. 1983 “Kultura I mir detstva. Isbrannye proizvedenija” [Culture and Commitment]. Institute of Ethnography named after M. Maklay. Serie “Ethnographic library”: 285;
OECD 2018 “Risks that Matter: Early Results from the 2018 OECD Cross-National Survey on Social and Economic Risks.” Policy Brief on the Future of Work. www.oecd.org/social/risks-that-matter.htm;
PalfreyJ., Gasser U. 2008. “Born digital. Understanding the first generation of digital natives”.New York: Basic Books: 375;
Schwab K. 2016. “Tschetvertaja Promyschlennaja Revolutcija” [The fourth industrial revolution]. “EKSMO”: 137;
Tapskott D. 1998. „Net Kids: die digitale Generation erobert Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft”. Wiesbaden:Gabler: 408;
Tengri News. 2016. “Kazakhstanskie deti chashe sverstnikov iz drugih stran sidjat v socsetjah”. [Kazakhstani children use social networks more than children from other countries]. https://tengrinews.kz/internet/kazahstanskie-deti-chasche-sverstnikov-drugih-stran-sidyat-295532

Қосымша файлдар

Как цитировать

Saparova, D., & Kanagatova, A. (2018). The prefigurative culture of Margaret Mead or the eternal problem of generation gap. ҚазҰУ Хабаршысы, Дінтану сериясы, 16(4), 34–41. https://doi.org/10.26577/EJRS-2018-4-186

Шығарылым

Бөлім

Ағылмдағы толық шығарылым